Cara Augustenborg
  • Home
  • The Verdant Yank
    • Climate Friday FAQs
  • Down To Earth
  • Media Appearances
    • Watch
    • Read
    • Listen
  • Upcoming Events
  • Gallery
  • About Cara
    • Publications

Climate Friday FAQ #4: Why wind?

2/19/2015

2 Comments

 
In my last Climate Friday FAQ, I explained that part of Ireland’s national solution to climate change must involve complete decarbonisation of our energy supply from a fossil fuel based system to one based on clean, renewable technologies. The evidence I found on how to make that transition in Ireland relied almost entirely on expansion of wind energy. However, I know there are criticisms, questions, anger and accusations around wind energy in our country. Ireland has committed to wind energy development more than any other renewable technology. So, this week, I wanted to find out, Why is wind the solution to climate change for Ireland’s energy sector?

Wind basics

Picture
Wind power is extracted from air flow using turbines or sails to produce mechanical or electrical power. Contrary to fossil fuels, wind energy is renewable, widely distributed, clean, and produces no greenhouse gas emissions during operation. World wind generation capacity more than quadrupled between 2000 and 2006, doubling about every three years. In 2014, global wind energy production was approximately 4% of total worldwide electricity usage and is expected to reach 8% by 2018.  Europe accounts for approximately half of the world’s total wind power generation capacity. At least 83 countries now use wind power on a commercial basis.

There are currently 222 wind farms on the island of Ireland, 85% of which are based in the Republic of Ireland. These windfarms generate enough electricity to power the equivalent of 1,877,850 homes. To date, we have saved approximately one billion Euro in fossil fuel imports in Ireland through the development of our wind industry.

Historically, hydro power was the largest contributor to renewable electricity in Ireland. However, since 1990, wind energy production has increased so that it now accounts for over 80% of the renewable electricity generated in the country. Wind, hydro and biomass electricity accounted for 16.3%, 2.1% and 1.7%, respectively, of Ireland’s gross electricity consumption in 2013. It is clear that wind energy is a fast growing, global industry, but "just because everyone else is doing it" is not reason enough for Ireland to follow.


Why is Ireland focusing primarily on wind as our renewable energy solution? 

PictureSpatial distribution of regional wind regimes in Europe. U.K., Ireland and Denmark possess favourable conditions for wind energy, while areas like Eastern Mediterranean are not favourable to wind energy.
Ireland is required to increase its share of renewable energy sources under the EU Renewables Directive and our international commitments to reduce greenhouse gas emissions to help prevent runaway climate change. There are many technologies we could employ to achieve these commitments (e.g. solar, biomass, hydro, geothermal, and even nuclear). No energy source is without problems and risks. However, for legal, moral, health, and energy security reasons, we must develop at least one renewable energy resource to move away from fossil fuel dependency.  In Ireland, we have clearly demonstrated a preference for wind.

There are accusations that industry is pushing the Irish government into over-development of the wind energy sector above other renewable resources. The reality is that, in Ireland, wind can make the most significant contribution to decarbonising our energy supply for the following reasons:

  • Wind speed: Ireland possess some of the most favourable wind conditions and highest onshore wind speeds in Europe. This gives us a competitive advantage at harnessing a renewable energy resource whose feedstock is essentially limitless. Other renewables require resources (e.g. land, unique geology, biomass, large water systems) that are in less plentiful supply in Ireland.

  • Environmental impact: The environmental impacts of wind energy are generally less problematic than other renewables. Wind turbines have the least impact on global warming compared to all other existing low carbon power sources. Only hydro power rivals wind with respect to its climate impact, but it suffers from the challenges of finding sites appropriate for dam construction and from impacts on fisheries and water quality. Unlike other renewables, wind farms do not compete with other land uses (e.g. food production) since turbine infrastructure occupies a relatively small area. There are also no waste products generated from wind energy production. 

  • Technological maturity: Globally, wind energy is the most technological mature and widely adopted of all the renewable technologies. Wind energy is more applicable and reliable than other forms of renewable energy (e.g. Wind has more potential operational hours than solar). This allows wind to be developed and maintained with greater ease and efficiency than other renewables. 

  • Cost competitiveness: Onshore wind is an inexpensive source of electricity that is competitive with, or cheaper than, fossil fuel plants. Wind power is capital intensive but has no fuel costs. The price of wind power is therefore much more stable than the volatility of fossil fuel prices. Wind turbines are also half the cost of solar panels per kWh. Only geothermal and hydro power rival wind in their levelized cost. However, the availability of appropriate locations of geothermal and hydro-electricity are far more restrictive than wind, particularly in Ireland. 


Obstacles to providing wind energy

Reliability: Wind energy is not without problems, the most obvious one of which is reliability -Electricity can’t be generated when the wind doesn’t blow. Economies of scale is one piece of the solution to this problem - As more turbines are connected over larger areas, the average power output becomes less variable and more predictable. Unlike conventional energy sources, wind power hardly ever suffers major technical failures since failures of individual wind turbines have almost no effect on overall power supply. Presently, grid systems with large wind penetration require a “spinning reserve” relying on fossil fuels to prevent a loss of electricity in the event that wind conditions are not favorable. However, technology is continuing to improve with respect to energy storage, turbine design and smart grid technology that will overcome these obstacles. Research indicates that 100% renewable energy production dominated by wind is already technologically possible if renewable resources such as biomass, solar and/or hydro are used as back-up power and interlinked with HVDC (high voltage direct current) transmission lines. This research also demonstrated that the costs of electricity production and HVDC transmission with such a system are relatively close to the current costs of electricity produced with conventional technologies.

Aesthetics: Wind turbines are often criticised as having a significant visual impact on the landscape. This is a highly personal issue that confirms the belief that “beauty is in the eye of the beholder”. However, surveys of public attitudes across Europe and in many other countries show strong public support for wind power. A 2010 survey in Scotland demonstrated that 52% of respondents disagreed with the statement that wind farms are "ugly and a blot on the landscape" and 59% agreed that wind farms were necessary to meet current and future energy needs and how they looked was unimportant. Strong public consultation and community ownership are essential in overcoming negative opinions on the aesthetic impact of wind turbines.

Habitat impacts: Wind turbines can result in increased bird and bat mortality and interference with wildlife or sensitive habitats. Therefore, it is important not to locate wind farms near sensitive ecological sites. Incentives could be provided for wind farm developments to be located in areas other than the coast and uplands, such as intensive farmland or industrial areas, where wildlife impacts are likely to be less severe.

Human impacts: Wind turbines have been accused of causing adverse human health impacts, such as noise disturbance, electro-magnetic radiation and shadow flicker. The noise detected 300 metres from a wind turbine is slightly louder than a refrigerator. One mile from a wind turbine, it is inaudible. Peer reviewed research indicates there are no negative health effects from audible or sub-audible sound from wind turbines. Only shadow flicker, in which wind turbines cast long shadows when the sun is low in the sky, has been demonstrated to irritate residents living near wind turbines. Irish wind farm sites are not likely to encounter significant shadow flicker very often, but the potential for flicker can be calculated prior to construction and turbines can be sited to minimise impacts on local residents. Wind turbine software is also available to turn off the relevant turbines during shadow flicker events. 

Why Wind? - Conclusion

Picture
Ireland has chosen wind as the primary technology to address our EU and international commitments to reduce our greenhouse gas emissions in the energy sector. The case for developing wind power over other renewable technologies is based in large part on our climatic and geographic conditions, land usage, and the technological and economic advantages of wind turbines compared to other renewable energy sources. Critics will cite the limitations of wind energy as an obstacle to achieving 100% fossil-free energy in a generation. However, the evidence detailed above demonstrates that technology already exists, and will continue to improve, to enable a wind-dominated energy system to become a reality in Ireland. Public involvement, community benefits and good planning must be prioritised to achieve such a system.   


Keep fighting the good fight!
-Cara


Picture
If you like this post, please share it on Twitter or Facebook. 

Feel free to contact me through e-mail, Twitter, or Facebook with any climate-related questions you’d like to see addressed in future posts.

Stay tuned next Friday for Climate Friday FAQ #5, when I'll tackle a reader's question: "Even if we stay under 2C of warming, could that trigger feedback loops that send us over?" 
2 Comments
Peter O Donovan
3/19/2015 10:43:03 pm

Hi Cara
The cost of subsidies and the requirement for having a fossil fuel back up to ensure network stability is still a big hurdle that needs to be resolved. There is increasing concern that the environmental damage from Windfarms on local populations is another high price.
On a wider strategic level the industrial base of Europe is being eroded and emissions are merely transferring to India and China so the global situation is worse if anything as standards are not nearly as good.

On the feedback issue. There is considerable doubt about the feedback loop issue in recent literature
Regards peter

Reply
Cara Augustenborg link
3/19/2015 11:25:10 pm

Peter. Thanks for feedback, but...
1. Fossil fuel does not need to be the back up. See reference to "spinning reserve" above
2. Network stability improves the more turbines you put on system. Traditional power plants are far more prone to failure.
3. I'd like to see your reference to "increasing concern". There are no peer-reviewed studies published indicating health impacts are real. There are environmental impacts from any kind of energy production, and wind energy has far lower impacts than most.
4. India and China are now world leaders in renewable energy investment. If you want Europe to compete with that, you'd want to hurry up and stop having to purchase fossil fuels from Russia to pay the energy bills...
5. Feedback loops are inherent in the natural system. There are LOTS of them. One example, rising temperature will cause permafrost to melt and that WILL result in further methane emissions from soil. Again, cite your source as I have not seen anything that questions the existence of all feedback loops..

Regards,
Cara

Reply

Your comment will be posted after it is approved.


Leave a Reply.

    Archives

    September 2019
    October 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    September 2017
    May 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    June 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    September 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014

    Categories

    All
    Elections
    Electoral_registar
    Green
    Vote

    RSS Feed

Proudly powered by Weebly